All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Systemd Maintainer Rejects BirthDate Field Addition to User Records

By

smartmic

2mo ago· 1 min readenCode

Summary

A systemd maintainer rejects a pull request that would add a birthDate field to user records, explaining that systemd only defines optional fields without enforcing policies and asking for the discussion to be moved elsewhere.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
It's an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps.
We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.
Hence, please move your discussion elsewhere, you are misunderstanding what systemd does here.
It enforces zero policy, it leaves that up for other parts of the system.
And sorry, I am really not interested in these discussions here. it's not the right place for this, and please don't bring it here.
Snippet from the RSS feed
This reverts commit acb6624, reversing changes made to ba1caf0. Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" After extensive community discussion, legal review and c...

You might also wanna read