Supreme Court strikes down coordinated spending limits between parties and candidates
By
Jessica Piper, Josh Gerstein
Summary
The Supreme Court has struck down limits on coordinated spending between political parties and their candidates, a ruling that is expected to benefit Republicans who rely more on large donors. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, argued the limits violated First Amendment-protected political speech. The decision opens the door for increased campaign spending ahead of midterm elections, with Democrats opposing the change as it concentrates power among wealthy donors.
Source

Key quotes
· 3 pulledJustice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, called the limits a 'severe infringement on First Amendment-protected political speech.'
The decision is a blow to Democrats, who argued that eliminating the limit on coordination would put more power into the hands of large donors who can cut bigger checks to party committees than to candidates.
He also argued the ruling eliminating the limits could bolster political parties generally.
You might also wanna read

Flawed SCOTUS Campaign Finance Ruling Opens New Avenues for Billionaires and Corporations to Buy Elections
U.S. Supreme Court strikes down campaign finance restrictions on candidate coordination with parties

Supreme Court Gives Blessing for Billionaires to Buy More Influence Over Politicians

Corporate Political Spending Surges to Record-Shattering Levels
US Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Cut $2 Billion in NIH Research Grants
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing it to proceed with cutting nearly $2 billion in active researc
Andreessen Horowitz Becomes Top Political Spender in Midterm Cycle with $115.5 Million
Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital firm co-founded by Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, has become the largest known political spender

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.