Supreme Court Justices Question Standing, Evidence in Murthy v. Missouri

Supreme Court throws doubt into questions of deference

Observers say lack of consistency will create problems for appellate courts about when they should intervene

Supreme Court upholds conviction, reaffirms inadmissibility of sexual history evidence

In a 7-2 split, however, the justices differed on whether that evidence could be revisited over the course of a trial.

Disfavored Precedent as a Challenge for the Lower Federal Courts

Interpreting the Court’s Fine Print

The imperative of judicial decorum and institutional integrity

New Delhi: The developments witnessed in the Supreme Court today have engendered profound disquiet and constitutional consternation amongst

The Occasionally Flimsy SCOTUS Sitting-Level Assignment Norm

SCOTUS watchers expect the justices to author an equal number of majority opinions for each argument sitting -- but is this illusory?