All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Superhuman CEO Shishir Mehrotra on AI Ethics: Attribution vs. Impersonation and Creator Rights

By

Nilay Patel

2mo ago· 68 min readen

Summary

This is an interview with Superhuman CEO Shishir Mehrotra discussing AI ethics, specifically the distinction between attribution and impersonation in AI-generated content. The conversation explores what AI companies owe creators when their work is used to train models, addressing the ethical boundaries between legitimate AI learning and unauthorized impersonation of individuals' voices, styles, or identities.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Superhuman CEO Shishir Mehrotra on the difference between attribution and impersonation — and what AI companies should owe creators.
He's a fascinating guy, and we actually scheduled this interview a month or so ago, thinking we'd talk about AI and what it's doing to software, platforms, and creativity pretty broadly.
Shishir also used to be the chief product officer at YouTube, and he's on the board of directors at Spotify.
Today, I'm talking with Shishir Mehrotra, who is CEO of Superhuman — that's the company formerly known as Grammarly, which is still its flagship product.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Superhuman CEO Shishir Mehrotra on the difference between attribution and impersonation — and what AI companies should owe creators.

You might also wanna read