SUED AGAIN: Lending Tree Sued In ANOTHER TCPA Class Action–This Time Over Failure to Identify Itself in Promotional Text Messages
From the article
Lending Tree is no stranger to TCPA lawsuits. It recently paid $19MM to settle a case involving Quote Wizard and then was almost immediately sued again in another TCPA class action. Not to mention all the class actions out there arising from it selling allegedly bad leads to buyer partners who then get sued. Well just yesterday Tree received more TCPA bad news– it was sued for allegedly sending promotional SMS messages without properly passing Caller ID information. In Model v. LendingTree, Inc., Case No. 8:26-cv-01749 (C.D. Cal) a consumer named Erica Model contends she received multiple promotional messages from LendingTree. Per the complaint, “more than one of these” failed to disclose the name of the telemarketer. The Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of: All persons within the United States to who, within the four years prior to the filing of this action through the date of class certification, Defendant (or a third-party acting on behalf of Defendant) placed two or more telemarketing calls in a 12- month period without the transmission of caller identification information that included either CPN or ANI and the Defendant or telemarketer’s name For anyone wondering– yes this is a viable theory at least in many jurisdictions. A marketer MUST pass on CNAM with SMS messages to avoid the risk of a TCPA class action– and I know that can be very difficult in some settings. Take aways: Lending Tree in more TCPA hot water; Marketers MUST pass along caller ID information in phone calls AND text messages if they want to avoid class action lawsuits!
Continue reading on The National Law ReviewYou might also wanna read

Untitled
infosec.exchange·6d ago
That Dropped Call with Customer Service? It Was on Purpose
theatlantic.com·1y ago
California Court Fines Attorney $10,000 for ChatGPT-Generated Fake Legal Citations
A California attorney was fined $10,000 for filing a court appeal containing 21 fake legal quotations generated by ChatGPT. The court issued
Why is it legal and ok when big corp. straight tries to scam a user?
news.ycombinator.com·5mo ago

For what reasons do investors file claims?
Ara·1d ago

For what reasons do investors file claims?
Ara·1d ago
Court Upholds $92 Million Fine Against T-Mobile for Selling Customer Location Data Without Consent
A federal appeals court upheld $92 million in fines against T-Mobile for illegally selling customer location data without consent. The Feder
arstechnica.com·10mo ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.