All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Starmer's US pharma deal criticized as costly threat to NHS and public health

By

Aditya Chakrabortty

4h ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty argues that Keir Starmer's government has pushed through a law facilitating a US medicine import deal that will cost the NHS billions, diverting funds from doctors, nurses, and cancer care. The piece frames this as a profound democratic failure, asserting that the government is acting against the public interest by prioritizing a trade deal with the US pharmaceutical industry over the health of British citizens, potentially causing harm greater than Covid.

Source

bskyStarmer's US pharma deal criticized as costly threat to NHS and public healththeguardian.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
We elect politicians to serve our interests. They direct the vital services that look after our families and communities, such as our healthcare and our schools. The entire political system rests on one basic premise: they work for us.
Rather than working for us, Keir Starmer and his ministers are acting against us.
They have rammed through parliament a sweeping law that will, independent experts agree, harm the public.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The deal on medicine imports will cost the NHS billions and take funding away from doctors, nurses, cancer scans and the rest, says Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.