All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Scientists question evidence behind teenage social media bans, warn of potential backfire effects

By

ABAngharad Brewer GillhamEditor

3d ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

Scientists argue that social media bans for teenagers lack solid scientific evidence and may backfire. Dr. Monika Neff Lind and colleagues, in a new Frontiers in Developmental Psychology article, contend that while bans on teen social media use are gaining momentum worldwide, there is no strong evidence supporting their effectiveness in improving youth mental health. The researchers warn that such bans could have unintended negative consequences and that alternative approaches should be considered.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
'We cannot ban our way out of a youth mental health crisis'
There is no solid scientific evidence behind these bans, and reason to believe they could backfire
Their proponents claim that social media bans will improve young people's mental health, but what evidence supports these claims?
Snippet from the RSS feed
Bans on teenagers’ social media use are gathering pace worldwide. Their proponents claim that social media bans will improve young people’s mental health, but w

You might also wanna read