Two California lawyers suspended six months for citing fake AI-generated cases in court filing
By
Bob Egelko
Summary
Two California lawyers, Mike Singh Sethi and William Rounds, were fined $2,500 each and suspended from practicing before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for six months after using AI to cite nonexistent cases in an immigration case filing. The court found they made "gross misrepresentations of real cases" and then claimed they hadn't knowingly done so, marking another instance of judicial crackdown on improper AI use in legal proceedings.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledJudges at U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals crack down on AI mistakes.
The attorneys ... filed briefs in an immigration case that contained 'gross misrepresentations of real cases'
when called to account
You might also wanna read
California Court Fines Attorney $10,000 for ChatGPT-Generated Fake Legal Citations
A California attorney was fined $10,000 for filing a court appeal containing 21 fake legal quotations generated by ChatGPT. The court issued
The Ongoing Problem of AI-Generated False Citations in Court Filings
This article examines the persistent problem of lawyers submitting court filings containing AI-hallucinated case citations, despite increase
India's Supreme Court Investigates Judge's Use of Fake AI-Generated Court Orders
India's Supreme Court has threatened legal consequences after discovering that a junior judge in Andhra Pradesh used fake AI-generated court
AI-Generated Legal Errors Surge in U.S. Courts, Study Finds
A new analysis from Laine AI reveals that AI-generated errors in U.S. court filings are rapidly escalating from isolated incidents to a wide

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.