SCOTUS—FIFRA Preempts State Failure-to-Warn Tort Claims
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell , No. 24-1068, that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts state-law…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
Unpacking the Consequences of the Decision in Monsanto Company v. Durnell
For more than a decade, litigation over glyphosate-based herbicides has sat at the intersection of federal pesticide regulation, state tort
Supreme Court Rules Against Pesticide Warning Labels in Monsanto v. Durnell
Decision to Shield Pesticide Makers from
centerforfoodsafety.org·14d ago
Supreme Court Sides with Monsanto in Roundup Case, Shielding Pesticide Companies from Failure-to-Warn Lawsuits
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a deeply troubling ruling in Monsanto v. Durnell, siding with Monsanto and holding that federal pestici
Supreme Court backs Bayer and Trump, limiting Americans’ right to sue over pesticide harms
Supreme Court backs Bayer and Trump, limiting Americans’ right to sue over pesticide harms Anthony Lacey June 25, 2026 WASHINGTON – In a dec
Supreme Court Rules 7-2 That Federal Approval Preempts State Cancer-Warning Lawsuits Against Bayer Over Roundup
The US Supreme Court shielded Bayer AG from tens of thousands of claims that its Roundup herbicide should have been labeled as a cancer risk
bloomberg.com·14d agoSupreme Court Gives Pesticide Corporations Immunity from Cancer Lawsuits
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with pesticide manufacturer Bayer in Monsanto Company v. Durnell, ruling that federal law preempts lawsu
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.