Response to authors’ reply about Prostate UK’s prostate risk checker
Agreement I do not Agree Body We are disappointed to note the authors’ reply to our letter. The authors have tried to justify the risk checker, and have not answered the points raised in our reply…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
Was Giving My Opinion to a Non-Patient Worth the Risk?
My cellphone rang in the mid-afternoon. I’m a mostly retired rheumatologist in my mid-70s. I’m a bit of a hermit who does not get many phone
Trusting your own judgement on 'AI' is a risk
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 11 # Comments: 0
Menstrual tracking app data is gold mine for advertisers that risks women safety
Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 32 # Comments: 23
My father is a cardiologist.
Taken from LinkedIn: -- My father is a cardiologist. I sent him this screenshot last week without telling him where it came from. He called
Is investing in medicines harming the health of the UK population?
A recent study published in the Lancet has disputed the existing decision-making threshold used by NICE. The authors argue that allowing NHS
The healthcare experience of prostate cancer patients: exploring the intersection of age and gender
Although researchers have conducted extensive studies of the psychosocial impacts of prostate cancer and its treatment on men’s bodies, mas
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.