Pung v. Isabella County: What the Supreme Court's 2026 Tax Foreclosure Ruling Means for Business Owners
The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in Pung v. Isabella County (2026) that tax foreclosure surplus is measured by the auction sale price, not fair market value, leaving commercial property owners — only ~20%…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
The Supreme Court just ruled your home equity isn't protected in a tax-foreclosure sale
The one-sided, evil injustice of our failed property taxing system is seen in a recent U.S. Supreme Court finding that a Michigan family can
The Hill: It’s not ‘just’ to erase someone’s home equity
In 2019, Isabella County, Mich., seized Timothy Pung's family home over a disputed tax debt of roughly $2,000. The county sold the house — w
Washington Supreme Court Limits Remedy of Nonjudicial Foreclosure to Holders of Negotiable Instruments
On April 30, 2026, the Washington Supreme Court published a decision in the case of Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1 that may have signi
Judicial Foreclosure and Receivership as Alternative Remedies for Washington Lenders After Vargas
On April 30, 2026, the Washington Supreme Court ruled in Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1 that only a “holder” of a negotiable instrumen
Wayne County failed to tell foreclosed homeowners about federal lawsuit, judge rules
Wayne County failed to notify tens of thousands of homeowners of its involvement in a pending federal class action lawsuit alleging “gross g
Hapcheon County Wins 20.5 Billion Won Reimbursement Suit
Hapcheon County won a 20.5 billion won reimbursement lawsuit filed by the builder of a collapsed hotel project, with the court ruling the co
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.