All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why programmers write documentation for AI assistants but not for colleagues

By

surprisetalk

29d ago· 3 min readenOpinion

Summary

Mark Dominus discusses the ironic phenomenon where programmers are willing to write detailed documentation files (like CLAUDE.md and PROJECT.md) for AI coding assistants like Claude, but resist writing similar documentation for their human coworkers. He explores possible reasons including the perception that AI needs more explicit context, the lower social friction of writing for a machine, and the practical benefits of documenting for AI tools that can actually read and act on the documentation. The article reflects on changing developer workflows and attitudes toward documentation in the age of AI-assisted programming.

Source

Hacker NewsWhy programmers write documentation for AI assistants but not for colleaguesblog.plover.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
I keep seeing programmers say how angry it makes them that people are willing to write detailed CLAUDE.md and PROJECT.md files for Claude to use, but they weren't willing to write them for their coworkers.
For larger projects, I've taken to having Claude maintain a handoff document that I can have the next Claude read, saying what we planned to do, what has been done, and other pertinent information.
Then when I shut down one Claude I can have
Snippet from the RSS feed
From the highly eclectic blog of Mark Dominus

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.