All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Wildfire Prediction Markets Draw Outrage from Survivors After Altadena Disaster

By

Kylie Mohr

1d ago· 7 min readenNews

Summary

This article examines the emergence of prediction markets that allow people to bet on catastrophic events like wildfires, focusing on the January 2025 Eaton and Palisades Fires in Altadena, California. It contrasts the devastating human toll — 16,000+ structures destroyed, 31 killed, and survivors like Sylvie Andrews losing everything — with the cold financial calculus of platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, where users can wager on fire perimeters, acreage, and containment dates. The piece explores the moral outrage from survivors who find the practice "reprehensible," concerns that such markets could incentivize arson, and the broader debate about whether financializing disaster prediction serves any public good or merely exploits tragedy.

Source

bskyWildfire Prediction Markets Draw Outrage from Survivors After Altadena Disasterwired.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
We put a lot of blood, sweat, and tears into it. That's what we lost in the fire.
It feels morally reprehensible to profit off of people's misery and death.
These markets don't just predict disasters — they create financial incentives for them to happen.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Wildfire survivors call fire-prediction markets “morally reprehensible” and worry they could increase the risk of arson.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.