All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

PRECISE: A Statistical Framework for Reducing LLM Bias in Search and Ranking Evaluations

By

[Submitted on 26 Jan 2026]

6d ago· 2 min readenInsight

Summary

This paper presents PRECISE, a statistical framework that extends Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) to combine minimal human annotations with LLM judgments for evaluating search, ranking, and RAG systems. The method addresses LLM bias by using as few as 100 human-annotated queries and 10,000 unlabeled examples to produce reliable metric estimates, significantly reducing annotation requirements. It reduces computational complexity from O(2^|C|) to O(2^K) and demonstrates reduced variance for Precision@K metrics while correcting LLM bias in low-resource settings.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
We present a statistical framework extending Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) that combines minimal human annotations with LLM judgments to produce reliable estimates of metrics which require sub-instance annotations.
Our method requires as few as 100 human-annotated queries and 10,000 unlabeled examples, reducing annotation requirements significantly compared to traditional approaches.
By reformulating the metric-integration space, we reduced the computational complexity from O(2^|C|) to O(2^K), where |C| represents corpus size (in order of millions).
Detailed experiments across prominent retrieval datasets demonstrate that our method reduces the variance of estimates for the business-critical Precision@K metric, while effectively correcting for LLM bias in low-resource settings.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Evaluating the quality of search, ranking and RAG systems traditionally requires a significant number of human relevance annotations. In recent times, several deployed systems have explored the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated judges for

You might also wanna read