All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Technical Analysis of Local RAG Implementation: Tradeoffs Between Inference Speed and Retrieval Accuracy

By

tmaly

4mo ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses local RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementation, focusing on model performance tradeoffs between inference speed and retrieval accuracy. The author shares insights from interactions with model creators, comparing different approaches including a 32M parameter model that uses tokenization + lookup table + averaging versus a 23M parameter transformer-based model. The discussion covers technical details about inference speeds (~22 documents per second on CPU) and the performance compromises involved in different architectural choices for local RAG systems.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
The tradeoff here is that you get even faster inference, but lose on retrieval accuracy
Specifically, inference will be faster because essentially you are only doing tokenization + a lookup table + an average
So despite the fact that their largest model is 32M params, you can expect inference speeds to be higher than ours, which 23M params but it is transformer-based
I am not sure about typical inference speeds on a CPU for their models, but with ours you can expect to do ~22 docs per second
Snippet from the RSS feed
I interacted with the authors of these models quite a bit!

You might also wanna read