All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

PostgreSQL 16 Benchmark: Hostim Leads Writes, Hetzner Leads Reads, AWS RDS Trails on Both

By

Pavel Voronov

3h ago· 7 min readenInsight

Summary

A like-for-like benchmark comparing PostgreSQL 16 performance across three platforms (AWS RDS, Hostim, and self-hosted on Hetzner) at the same 2 vCPU / 4 GB tier. Hostim delivered the fastest writes (2.5× AWS RDS throughput), Hetzner had the fastest reads, and AWS RDS was slowest on both metrics. The analysis includes exact reproduction commands and reveals that high-availability costs dramatically change the total cost picture beyond the listed sticker price.

Source

Hacker NewsPostgreSQL 16 Benchmark: Hostim Leads Writes, Hetzner Leads Reads, AWS RDS Trails on Bothhostim.dev

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Hostim had the fastest writes, about 2.5× the write throughput of AWS RDS db.t4g.medium and 2.1× a default self-hosted Postgres on Hetzner.
Hetzner had the fastest reads, on raw per-core CPU speed.
RDS was slowest or near-slowest on both, and its listed price is the smallest part of the real bill.
Snippet from the RSS feed
A like-for-like pgbench comparison of managed and self-hosted Postgres at the same size and price tier, with the real cost of high availability included, not just the sticker price.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.