All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Study finds physical car controls faster and safer than touchscreens for drivers

By

hubraumhugo

28d ago· 2 min readenNews

Summary

A Swedish motoring magazine, Vi Bilägare, conducted tests comparing touchscreen interfaces to physical buttons in cars. Drivers performed basic tasks (changing radio station, adjusting temperature) while driving at 110 km/h. Results showed that touchscreens significantly increase the time needed to complete these tasks compared to physical controls. A 17-year-old Volvo without a touchscreen was used as a baseline for comparison.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Drivers take much longer to perform regular tasks on in-vehicle touch screens compared to physical buttons and switches
Vi Bilägare selected 11 modern cars from different manufacturers for tests at an airfield, measuring the time needed for a driver to perform different basic tasks
A 17 year-old Volvo, without a touchscreen was selected, for comparison
Snippet from the RSS feed
Drivers take much longer to perform regular tasks on in-vehicle touch screens compared to physical buttons and switches, according to tests carried out by a Swedish motoring magazine.

You might also wanna read