All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Political interference in academic research: OMB proposed changes threaten peer-review system

By

Kate Clancy

3h ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article discusses the Trump administration's OMB proposed regulatory changes from May 29, 2026, that would fundamentally alter federal research grants by requiring political appointees to give final approval on grant funding, effectively ending peer-review as we know it. The author, writing from the perspective of a University of Illinois faculty union member, argues this represents political interference in academic research that threatens the integrity of the scientific process.

Source

bskyPolitical interference in academic research: OMB proposed changes threaten peer-review systembuttondown.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
On May 29, 2026, the Trump administration's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed regulatory changes that will fundamentally alter federal research grants in this country.
It is devastating and includes many elements that will end peer-review as we know it.
Political appointees will: 1) be required to give final approval...
Snippet from the RSS feed
If you’re at all plugged in to science, or academia, you likely know about the OMB proposed changes. If you don’t, let me share directly from the literature...

You might also wanna read

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·1mo ago

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·1mo ago

OMB proposal threatens to upend US scientific research with anti-'woke' rule changes

The article warns that a 412-page proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), issued May 29th, uses Trumpian attacks on "woke"

theverge.com·3d ago

White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants

The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o

scientificamerican.com·27d ago

White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants

The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o

scientificamerican.com·27d ago

Trump Administration Places Federal Grant Funding Under Political Control

The Trump administration has issued an executive order placing all federal grant funding, including research grants, under political control

arstechnica.com·10mo ago

Commentary on OMB proposed rule restricting federal grant funding for foreign collaborations

This article is a comment on the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) proposed rule for federal financial assistance, specifically critic

go.aps.org·7d ago

Heads up @NASA . "Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants" "Hundreds of grant applications to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) are being held up at any given time by

nature.com·5d ago

Heads up @NASA . "Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants" "Hundreds of grant applications to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) are being held up at any given time by

nature.com·5d ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.