All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Performance Implications of UUID Version 4 as Primary Keys in PostgreSQL

By

pil0u

5mo ago· 15 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses performance issues with using UUID Version 4 as primary keys in PostgreSQL databases, explaining that random UUIDs cause poor performance due to excessive I/O operations and index fragmentation. It contrasts Version 4 UUIDs with sequential UUIDs (like Version 1 or ULIDs) that maintain temporal ordering, which leads to better cache efficiency and reduced index bloat. The author recommends using sequential UUID alternatives or database-generated sequences for better performance in high-volume systems.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
UUID Version 4 has mostly random bits, obfuscating information like when the value was created or where it was generated.
These databases have usually had bad performance and excessive IO.
Random UUIDs cause index fragmentation and poor cache locality, leading to performance degradation.
Sequential UUIDs maintain temporal ordering, which leads to better cache efficiency and reduced index bloat.
I recommend using sequential UUID alternatives or database-generated sequences for better performance in high-volume systems.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Introduction Over the last decade, when working on databases with UUID Version 41 as the primary key data type, these databases have usually had bad performance and excessive IO. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4122#section-4.4 ↩

You might also wanna read