All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Judge Mehta Declines to Ban Google's Default Search Payments Despite Monopoly Ruling

Judge Amit Mehta's September 2025 remedies opinion in the U.S. v. Google search case found that Google illegally maintained its search monopoly through multi-billion-dollar default placement payments to Apple, Samsung, Mozilla, and others. However, despite identifying these payments as the core anticompetitive conduct, Judge Mehta declined to ban them, leaving a key remedy unaddressed.

Authors:Eugene Kimmelman1h ago1 min readenInsight
Read on hks.harvard.edu

Key quotes

At the heart of that monopoly were Google's multi-billion-dollar payments to distributors—Apple, Samsung, Mozilla, and others—to lock in Google Search as the default on nearly every mobile device and across much of the desktop browser market.
Yet despite identifying these payments as the central anticompetitive conduct, Judge Mehta declined to ban them.

From the article

In September 2025, Judge Amit Mehta issued the long-awaited remedies opinion in the United States v. Google search case, in which he had previously held that Google illegally maintained its monopoly in general search services. At the heart of that monopol
Continue reading on hks.harvard.edu

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.