All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Fear-mongering about AI job losses harms the economy more than AI itself

By

Robert J. Shiller

9d ago· 2 min readenOpinion

Summary

This guest essay argues that excessive fear-mongering about AI's impact on jobs — dubbed "doomaxxing" — is more harmful to the economy than AI itself. The author notes that since ChatGPT's 2022 release, tech leaders have amplified warnings about job losses, fueling public anxiety (70% of Americans believe AI will reduce employment). While the author agrees AI could lower employment, the piece contends that consumers' fear-based reactions to AI pose a greater economic threat than the technology's actual impact.

Source

bskyFear-mongering about AI job losses harms the economy more than AI itselfnytimes.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Moments after ChatGPT was released in 2022, its emergence swiftly unleashed a flood of alarming prognostications, including the possibility of enormous job losses.
A recent poll finding that 70 percent believe that the technology will reduce employment opportunities.
The economic impact of A.I. is less concerning than consumers' fear-based reactions to it.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The economic impact of A.I. is less concerning than consumers’ fear-based reactions to it.

You might also wanna read

Guest Essay: Fear-Based Reactions to AI Pose Greater Economic Risk Than the Technology Itself

This guest essay argues that excessive fear-mongering about AI's impact on jobs—termed "doomaxxing"—is more harmful to the economy than AI i

nytimes.com·12d ago

Guest Essay: Fear-Based Reactions to AI Pose Greater Economic Risk Than the Technology Itself

This guest essay argues that excessive fear-mongering about AI's impact on jobs—termed "doomaxxing"—is more harmful to the economy than AI i

nytimes.com·12d ago

What labor data actually reveals about AI's impact on jobs

The article challenges the widespread hysteria about AI wiping out jobs, arguing that current labor statistics do not support doomsday scena

technologyreview.com·1mo ago

What labor data actually reveals about AI's impact on jobs

The article challenges the widespread hysteria about AI wiping out jobs, arguing that current labor statistics do not support doomsday scena

technologyreview.com·1mo ago

Economists debate whether AI will cause mass job displacement or transform labor markets gradually

This article features a discussion between Goldman Sachs' Allison Nathan and MIT economists Daron Acemoglu and Neil Thompson, along with Gol

goldmansachs.com·2d ago

Concerns About AI Job Displacement and Comparative Advantage Understanding

The article is a response to David Oks' essay arguing that AI job displacement panic is overblown. The author agrees with some points but ex

lesswrong.com·4mo ago

How to survive AI mass replacement (and escape wage slavery)

The article argues that fears of AI replacing all jobs are overblown and driven by social media hysteria. It critiques people who adopt an a

letters.thedankoe.com·11d ago

AI and the Future of Work: Why Job Displacement Doesn't Mean the End of Employment

The article argues against the common fear that AI will lead to widespread unemployment, drawing parallels to historical economic transition

kellblog.com·3mo ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.