All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

MTG Bench: A benchmark evaluating LLM performance in playing Magic: The Gathering

By

CallumFerg

12h ago· 7 min readenInsight

Summary

MTG Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate how well Large Language Models (LLMs) can play Magic: The Gathering. The article presents results from testing various LLMs (including Fable 5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5) on their ability to understand and execute complex game mechanics like scrying, discovering, and tutoring. It highlights both successes (e.g., Gemini 3.5 Flash handling complex turns) and failures (e.g., Opus 4.8 returning cards to deck incorrectly, GPT 5.5 forgetting to return exiled cards). The benchmark evaluates LLMs on strategic gameplay, rule adherence, and tool use within the Magic: The Gathering card game environment.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
Gemini 3.5 flash performs complex turn with scry, discover, and tutor effects
Opus 4.8 erroneously returns a card to the deck then self reports the mistake
Gpt 5.5 forgets to return cards exiled with discover to the deck and self reports the mistake
Fabel 5 makes a tool mistake, then silently tries to restart the turn (caught by evaluation later)
The main idea is that if an LLM is
Snippet from the RSS feed
MTG Bench tests how well LLMs can play Magic.

You might also wanna read