India's states struggle between prohibition ideals and alcohol revenue needs
By
The Economist
Summary
Indian states face a conflicted relationship with alcohol, as constitutional directives call for prohibition while economic pressures drive them to rely on alcohol revenue. The article highlights how states like Kerala and Maharashtra enforce dry days and permit systems, but financial troubles are pushing some states toward more rational alcohol policies rather than outright bans.
Source
Key quotes
· 4 pulledThe Directive Principles of State Policy enshrined in the country's constitution call on governments to 'endeavour to bring about prohibition'.
In Kerala the first day of every month is dry.
In Maharashtra drinkers must (in theory) have a state-issued permit.
These attempts to cut down should be familiar to anyone who has ever woken up worse for wear and vowed never to drink again.
You might also wanna read
Indian distillers revive mahua, a heritage flower-liquor banned since British colonial rule
Mahua, a traditional Indian liquor made from mahua tree flowers, has been banned since the 19th century by British colonialists who deemed i

Florida Sparks Outrage With Move to Bar Undocumented Students From State Colleges and Universities
UK Pubs Face Financial Pressure: Interactive Tool Shows Local Impact
The article discusses the financial pressures facing UK pubs, including rising costs, taxes, and business rates. It introduces a 'Fucked Pub
Critique of Controversial Drug Treatment Proposal: Why Providing Drugs to Addicts Wouldn't Work
The article critically examines a controversial proposal to treat hard drug addiction by providing drugs at government facilities conditiona
Research Study on Tariff Burden Distribution in European Wine Imports
This article discusses an economic research paper examining how tariffs on European wine imports affect different parties in the supply chai
Federal Appeals Court Overturns 158-Year-Old Ban on Home Distilling as Unconstitutional
A U.S. appeals court has declared unconstitutional a 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, ruling that the prohibition is an unnecess

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.