All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Opinion: New Zealand's public service job cuts before AI adoption is the wrong sequence, says Justin Flitter

By

Justin Flitter

6h ago· 1 min readenOpinion

Summary

Justin Flitter argues that New Zealand's government is making a strategic error by cutting 9,000 public service jobs first and turning to AI as a replacement. He contends the correct sequence should be: build the context engine (domain knowledge, operational context, governance, and trust layer) first, then redesign workflows, then realize efficiency gains. This approach would make the public service more capable and resilient, not just smaller.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Build the context engine first: that's the domain knowledge, operational context, governance protocols and trust layer that let AI amplify capability instead of compounding risk.
Then redesign the workflows. Then realise the efficiency. In that sequence, AI makes the public service more capable and more resilient, not just smaller, he says.
The Government's announcement of close to 9000 public service job cuts and artificial intelligence as the replacement is the most consequential AI decision New Zealand has made this year. It is also operationally backward.
Snippet from the RSS feed
OPINION: Alethios research shows most public-sector AI use remains scattered.

You might also wanna read