Isaac Asimov on the Relativity of Wrong: How Scientific Theories Evolve Through Progressive Refinement
I received a letter from a reader the other day. It was handwritten in crabbed penmanship so that it was very difficult to read. Nevertheless, I tried to make it out just in case it might prove to be…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
How astronomers and amateurs alike mistake celestial objects — a look at cosmic misidentifications
Sometimes we mistake one kind of object with another to disastrous effect
scientificamerican.com·16d ago
Discovery is not the opposite of application - Nature Reviews Physics
“Fundamental science, the argument goes, is a luxury that becomes dispensable when budgets are tight. This premise is wrong, and the consequ
Was Einstein wrong about anything?
Albert Einstein is regarded as a genius, but even he admitted that his work wasn't perfect. So what did he get wrong?
Was Einstein wrong about anything?
Albert Einstein is regarded as a genius, but even he admitted that his work wasn't perfect. So what did he get wrong?
Cosmologist challenges splashy Nature study, citing fundamental error in interpreting galactic data
A recent study in the journal Nature carries cosmos-quaking implications for our understanding of the universe—except a new preprint says th
scientificamerican.com·7d agoIN JOY STILL FELT by Isaac Asimov
In a recent review, I wrote of Isaac Asimov (1920 – 1992) and his importance to my own science fiction reading. In the last century he was o
Clearing Up Common Misconceptions About Special Relativity
We provide some guidance and examples to clear up common misconceptions about special relativity. These misconceptions often come from tryin
arxiv.org·1mo ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.