Is secureblue really more secure if browsers have to be installed in flatpaks?
By
@overdrawn98901
22h ago
Source
discuss.privacyguides.netIs secureblue really more secure if browsers have to be installed in flatpaks?privacyguides.netAlso correct, I was assuming non tor usage, otherwise Mullvad Browser has no reason to exist.
You might also wanna read
Security Vulnerabilities in Flatpak's Sandboxing for Linux Applications
The article examines the security gaps in Flatpak's sandboxing technology for Linux applications, which promises strong isolation but in pra
linuxjournal.com·11mo agoI Tried Tor Browser on Raspberry Pi: Here’s How It Works
DRM Can Watch You Too: Privacy Effects of Browsers' Widevine EME (2023)
hal.science·1y ago
MakuluLinux (6.4M Downloads) Ships Persistent Backdoor from Developer's Own C2
werai.ca·5mo ago
A post-mortem of the malicious event-stream backdoor
Snyk·7y ago
Francis Mangion (M) (VR/AR/*): "Jeff Hall - PCIGuru (@)jbhall56(@)infosec.exchang…" - Mastodon server for AR/VR enthusiasts
arvr.social·11d ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.