All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why targeted suicide prevention for high-risk men should complement population-level strategies

By

Seena Fazel

4h ago· 6 min readen

Summary

This editorial by Seena Fazel argues that while population-level public health strategies (reducing stigma, improving mental health literacy, promoting help-seeking) are important for suicide prevention in men, they are insufficient given persistently high suicide rates among men. The author advocates for prioritizing targeted, specialized approaches for high-risk individuals—such as those with mental illness, recent self-harm, or criminal justice involvement—alongside broader population strategies. The piece examines evidence gaps, risk stratification methods, and the need for clinical interventions tailored to men at elevated risk.

Source

bskyWhy targeted suicide prevention for high-risk men should complement population-level strategiesplos.io

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
It is widely known that suicide risk disproportionately affects men, who are three times more likely to die from suicide than women and account for 75%–80% of suicide deaths in high-income countries.
Despite public health strategies focusing on men's mental health and suicide risk, rates of suicide among men remain concerningly high.
Targeted, specialized approaches for high-risk individuals should be prioritized alongside broader population-level strategies.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Despite public health strategies focusing on men’s mental health and suicide risk, rates of suicide among men remain concerningly high. In this Editorial, Seena Fazel outlines why targeted, specialized approaches for high-risk individuals should be priori

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.