All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Concerns grow over Bun's future after Anthropic acquisition

By

William Johnston

27d ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

The author expresses concern about Bun, a JavaScript runtime and toolchain, after its acquisition by Anthropic in December 2025. While Bun is praised as excellent software that makes TypeScript development a joy, the author worries it may follow the same "enshittification" path as Claude Code (another Anthropic-owned product that has been getting worse). Despite Anthropic's reassurances that Bun will remain open source, MIT-licensed, and with the same team, the author fears corporate ownership could degrade the product over time.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Bun is great software. I use it all the time. It is fast and practical, and the team ships constantly.
I want Bun to win. I want a serious Node.js alternative. I want faster installs, faster tests, better bundling, and less toolchain bloat.
The announcement said everything I wanted to hear: Bun stays open source and MIT-licensed, the same team keeps working on it, and the roadmap keeps focusing
Snippet from the RSS feed
Bun is excellent software. Anthropic owns it now, Bun sits under Claude Code, and Claude Code getting worse makes me worried Bun could follow the same enshittification path.

You might also wanna read