All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

How X.400 could have made email more powerful than SMTP did

By

maguay

1mo ago· 13 min readenInsight

Summary

This article explores an alternate history of email where the X.400 standard could have won over SMTP, leading to a more feature-rich email experience. It contrasts the rigid, comprehensive X.400 protocol (which defined what email should be capable of, like message recall, versioning, scheduled delivery, auto-destruction, and threading) with the simpler, pragmatic SMTP approach (which focused on what was necessary to get messages delivered). The article examines how SMTP's minimalism and flexibility ultimately won out, but at the cost of many advanced features that X.400 promised.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
If the history of email had gone somewhat differently, the last email you sent could have been rescinded or superseded by a newer version when you accidentally wrote the wrong thing.
You would never have needed to type 'as per my previous message.' Instead, you could have linked emails together into a personal Wikipedia of correspondence.
X.400 said what must be possible. SMTP said what must be done.
Snippet from the RSS feed
X.400 said what must be possible. SMTP said what must be done.

You might also wanna read