All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why small pull request policies can backfire on software quality

1h ago· 8 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article critiques a common software engineering policy that limits pull requests (PRs) to small sizes (e.g., 500 lines, few files). While these policies aim to improve reviewability and quality, the author argues they can be counterproductive. Splitting large features into many tiny PRs often breaks logical coherence, makes it harder to understand the full picture, increases overhead, and can lead to integration issues. The author suggests that the software industry is "annealing" (improving through process) but in the wrong direction—prioritizing process metrics over actual software quality and developer productivity.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Splitting a single 6000-line feature or fix into twelve 500-line PRs is more work, but each of those PRs is surely easier to review.
The software industry is annealing, but wrong.
Each pull request should be no more than a few files, and no more than a certain number of lines (say 500). And do just one thing and do it well.
All those are good requirements, right? Surely this is quality software engineering.
Snippet from the RSS feed
In recent months I've heard of several teams with an interesting policy: each pull request should be no more than a few files, and no more t...

You might also wanna read