All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

How mega-science and AI are challenging traditional science journalism

By

Chris Mooney

11d ago· 16 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the challenges of science communication in an era of "mega-science" — where approximately 3.5 million scientific studies are published annually. It explores how traditional "study story" models of science journalism are becoming inadequate, especially with AI's ability to rapidly produce such stories. The author reflects on the overwhelming volume of scientific output and the difficulties journalists and communicators face in covering it meaningfully, while also addressing the systemic issues in how science is produced, funded, and communicated to the public.

Source

bskyHow mega-science and AI are challenging traditional science journalismreportearth.substack.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
In my last post here, I wrote about problems with the 'study story' model of science journalism, especially given the arrival of AI, which can potentially churn out these stories far more rapidly than human writers can.
The post was one of my most popular so far here on Substack, and drew some notable responses.
How do we communicate about -- or as journalists, cover -- 3.5 million scientific studies per year?
Snippet from the RSS feed
How do we communicate about -- or as journalists, cover -- 3.5 million scientific studies per year?

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.