How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship and Threaten Free Speech
By
pabs3
Crackling crust, pillowy middle. The kind of bagel that earns a second cup of coffee.
Summary
The article examines how app stores and mobile operating systems enable corporate-government censorship by controlling what apps users can access. It argues that the combination of government overreach and technocratic infrastructure choices creates a system where a few tech companies (Apple and Google) act as gatekeepers, potentially allowing governments to pressure them into removing apps or content. The piece warns that this centralized control threatens free speech and democratic principles, drawing parallels to totalitarian control systems.
Key quotes
· 5 pulledWhat happens when your device can only run what the government decides is OK? We are dangerously close to this kind of totalitarian control, thanks to a combination of government overreach and technocratic infrastructure choices.
While these devices are critical to most people's daily lives, what they can actually do is shaped by what apps are readily available.
A slim majority of Americans get their apps from just two companies: Apple and Google.
This centralized control creates a perfect environment for censorship: governments can pressure these few companies to remove apps or content they don't like.
When a handful of corporations control the digital public square, they become de facto arbiters of speech, and governments know exactly who to pressure.
You might also wanna read
UN declares child online safety an 'urgent priority,' calls for tech accountability
The UN has declared protecting children online an 'urgent priority,' with UN rights chief Volker Turk calling on states to hold tech giants
FCC's Proposed DRM-Based ATSC Standard Threatens Public Access to Free Broadcast Airwaves
The article warns about an FCC proposal to implement a DRM-based standard (ATSC Transition) for digital television that would give a private
Norwegian digital ID system: Success in digitalization, failure in accessibility and oversight
Professor Marte Eidsand Kjørven's research on digital identity management in Norway reveals a dual reality: while solutions like BankID have
Age verification for social media bans threatens privacy for all users
Australia's decision to restrict social media access for children under 16 has sparked global debate, with similar proposals being discussed
Take It Down Act Now Enforced: Legal Requirement for Platforms to Remove Nonconsensual Intimate Images
The Take It Down Act, signed into law in 2025 and now fully enforced, requires online platforms to implement processes for removing nonconse
Frustration grows over stalled digital rights and privacy advocacy progress
The article discusses the lack of progress in digital rights and privacy advocacy, expressing frustration that the anticipated "digital righ
discuss.privacyguides.net·4d ago