Health equity researchers warn White House grant proposal could threaten federal funding for disparities studies
By
Anil Oza
Summary
A White House proposal to overhaul federal grant-making processes contains provisions that health disparities researchers say could disqualify much of their work from funding. The 412-page proposal would diminish the role of peer review in grant decisions and place more authority with political appointees. Researchers fear this could threaten the future of health equity research, as studies focused on marginalized communities and racial disparities may face heightened scrutiny or be deemed ineligible under new criteria.
Source
bskyHealth equity researchers warn White House grant proposal could threaten federal funding for disparities studiesstatnews.comKey quotes
· 3 pulledDeep inside a White House proposal to overhaul how the government awards grants is a short section that health disparities researchers say could disqualify much of their work from federal funding — perhaps the most serious threat yet to the future of their field.
Since it was issued last month, the 412-page proposal has drawn thousands of public comments, in large part because it would diminish the power of peer review in determining which grants are funded, and place that authority with political appointees.
Less attention has been given to how the proposed changes could affect efforts to [address health equity]
You might also wanna read
White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o
scientificamerican.com·17d agoWhite House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o
scientificamerican.com·17d ago
Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will
The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin
arstechnica.com·22d agoProposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will
The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin
arstechnica.com·22d ago
HHS and FDA announce reforms to accelerate clinical trials and restore US research leadership
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), along with Acting FDA Commissioner Kyle Diamantas and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, anno
writingruxandrabio.com·6h ago
HHS Launches Department-Wide Initiative to Revitalize US Leadership in Clinical Trials
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a coordinated department-wide initiative to restore American leadership in
hhs.gov·10h ago
HHS Terminates Millions in Grants to American Academy of Pediatrics, Affecting Child Health Programs
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has terminated seven grants totaling millions of dollars to the American Academy of Pediatr
washingtonpost.com·6mo ago
Trump Administration Places Federal Grant Funding Under Political Control
The Trump administration has issued an executive order placing all federal grant funding, including research grants, under political control
arstechnica.com·10mo agoComments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.