Scientific Society Leaders Resist Proposed OMB Rule Politicizing Federal Research Grants
By
Jessica Miles
Summary
This guest post by Jessica Miles examines how scientific society publishing leaders are responding to the proposed OMB rule change that would require federal grant awards to "demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities," with determinations made by political appointees rather than senior scientists. The article features conversations with leaders from organizations like the American Geophysical Union, American Mathematical Society, and others who are actively resisting the rule through public comments, advocacy, and coalition-building. These leaders express concerns about the rule's potential to politicize scientific research funding, undermine peer review, and threaten the integrity of the scientific enterprise.
Source
Key quotes
· 5 pulledThe proposed rule would allow political appointees, not scientists, to determine whether research 'demonstrably advances the President's policy priorities.'
This is not about one administration or another — it's about the principle that scientific research funding should be based on scientific merit, not political alignment.
We are seeing unprecedented unity across scientific societies in opposition to this rule, regardless of the political leanings of their memberships.
If adopted, this rule could fundamentally alter the relationship between the federal government and the scientific community for generations.
Our members are deeply concerned that this would chill research in areas that might be seen as politically sensitive, even if they are scientifically vital.
You might also wanna read
OMB proposal threatens to upend US scientific research with anti-'woke' rule changes
The article warns that a 412-page proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), issued May 29th, uses Trumpian attacks on "woke"
Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will
The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin
arstechnica.com·1mo agoProposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will
The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin
arstechnica.com·1mo agoCommentary on OMB proposed rule restricting federal grant funding for foreign collaborations
This article is a comment on the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) proposed rule for federal financial assistance, specifically critic
White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o
White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.