All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Scientific Society Leaders Resist Proposed OMB Rule Politicizing Federal Research Grants

By

Jessica Miles

2h ago· 12 min readenInsight

Summary

This guest post by Jessica Miles examines how scientific society publishing leaders are responding to the proposed OMB rule change that would require federal grant awards to "demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities," with determinations made by political appointees rather than senior scientists. The article features conversations with leaders from organizations like the American Geophysical Union, American Mathematical Society, and others who are actively resisting the rule through public comments, advocacy, and coalition-building. These leaders express concerns about the rule's potential to politicize scientific research funding, undermine peer review, and threaten the integrity of the scientific enterprise.

Source

bskyScientific Society Leaders Resist Proposed OMB Rule Politicizing Federal Research Grantsscholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
The proposed rule would allow political appointees, not scientists, to determine whether research 'demonstrably advances the President's policy priorities.'
This is not about one administration or another — it's about the principle that scientific research funding should be based on scientific merit, not political alignment.
We are seeing unprecedented unity across scientific societies in opposition to this rule, regardless of the political leanings of their memberships.
If adopted, this rule could fundamentally alter the relationship between the federal government and the scientific community for generations.
Our members are deeply concerned that this would chill research in areas that might be seen as politically sensitive, even if they are scientifically vital.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Today's post features conversations with society publishing leaders resisting the proposed OMB rule change for federal research funding.

You might also wanna read

OMB proposal threatens to upend US scientific research with anti-'woke' rule changes

The article warns that a 412-page proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), issued May 29th, uses Trumpian attacks on "woke"

theverge.com·9d ago

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·1mo ago

Proposed US funding rules would let political appointees override peer review and cancel grants at will

The article discusses proposed changes to US government grant funding rules under the Trump administration, which would shift decision-makin

arstechnica.com·1mo ago

Commentary on OMB proposed rule restricting federal grant funding for foreign collaborations

This article is a comment on the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) proposed rule for federal financial assistance, specifically critic

go.aps.org·13d ago

White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants

The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o

scientificamerican.com·1mo ago

White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants

The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o

scientificamerican.com·1mo ago

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.