“Global Health Charity Founders on GiveWell, Evidence Action, and M+E” by anonfounder

The following is a lightly edited and anonymized transcript of a discussion among charity founders, researchers, and funders in Ambitious Impact's Slack workspace about GiveWell's decision to stop funding Evidence Action's Dispensers for Safe Water program. The conversation surfaced themes that we felt were worth sharing more broadly. Everyone involved consented to their thoughts being shared in this way. An LLM was used to process and anonymize the transcript. For context/credibility, several of the organizations involved were GiveWell grantees. Core Takeaways I drew out a few core themes from the conversation as takeaways up at the top. The full anonymized discussion is reproduced below. Names have been redacted, and some messages have been rephrased to remove identifying details. 1. Independent verification steps have to be happening. M+E, at minimum, should be validating core program inputs and outputs at the start and end of a theory of change (e.g., in a basic healthcare program, you’d like to know whether the child was actually sick at the start of treatment, and whether they were actually healthy at the end of treatment). It was surprising this seemed to come late to Dispensers for Safe Water. 2. GiveWell probably underestimates implementation difficulty across [...] --- Outline: (00:44) Core Takeaways (02:45) The Discussion --- First published: May 17th, 2026 Source: --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO .