All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks poorly in Android coding benchmarks at 3x the cost of competitors

By

Andrew Romero

15d ago· 4 min readenNews

Summary

Google released benchmark results ranking AI models for Android coding, with its own Gemini 3.5 Flash performing poorly — failing to crack the top five while being three times more expensive per token than competitors. The article highlights the industry shift from general chatbots to agentic coding models as "vibe coding" grows in popularity, where developers offload software development to LLMs.

Source

bskyGoogle's Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks poorly in Android coding benchmarks at 3x the cost of competitors9to5google.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash is easily the most resource-intensive in Android development, and it doesn't even make the top five.
As the hype for general chatbots is dying down, companies like Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic are shifting towards agentic models with a strength in coding.
Users have begun relying on these models for 'vibe coding,' which essentially offloads the bulk of software development to LLMs.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Google has released another set of benchmark results to determine the best AI models for Android coding, along with how...

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.