All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Flawed Management Science Study on Sustainability and Stock Returns Continues to Be Cited Despite Evidence of Problems

By

timr

4mo ago· 13 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses a landmark study in Management Science that has been cited over 6,000 times and referenced by Wall Street executives, government officials, and a former U.S. Vice President, but is allegedly fatally flawed. It examines how institutional failures in the scholarly publication process undermine trust in science, focusing on a case where a flawed study on sustainability and stock returns continues to be cited despite evidence of its problems. The piece highlights the failure of academic gatekeepers (editors, reviewers, research-integrity officers) to address these issues and the broader implications for scientific credibility.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
This paper in Management Science has been cited more than 6,000 times. Wall Street executives, top government officials, and even a former U.S. Vice President have all referenced it. It's fatally flawed, and the scholarly community refuses to do anything about it.
For a long time, I [King] resisted the accumulating evidence that our institutions for curating trustworthy science were failing.
I believed our academic gatekeepers–editors, reviewers, and research-integrity officers–were quietly doing their jobs. Overstretched, but nevertheless, curating a trustworthy body of knowledge.
Snippet from the RSS feed

You might also wanna read