First clear evidence that courts will (probably correctly but unfortunately) treat Chatrie the same way they treated Carpenter: as a narrow exception to the third party doctrine that only applies to v

First clear evidence that courts will (probably correctly but unfortunately) treat Chatrie the same way they treated Carpenter: as a narrow exception to the third party doctrine that only applies to very specific types of information, i.e. cell phone geolocation data. We still have a lot of work to do. Goal should be a trespass theory of 4th Amendment and end to Katz/third party doctrine a la Justice Gorsuch. And btw, I'm not suggesting that otherwise public peer-to-peer network traffic is worthy of 4th amendment protections, it's probably not, I am just observing Orin's point that the court didn't even feel the need to address the new Chatrie opinion.

First clear evidence that courts will (probably correctly but unfortunately) treat Chatrie the same way they treated Carpenter: as a narrow exception to the third party doctrine that only applies to v

Source

You might also wanna read

Fed Holds Rates Steady, No Cuts Expected Until 2027; Trump Iran Remarks Rattle Markets

Cboe data shows mixed options sentiment in Bitdeer Technologies Group with shares down 3.88%

NBC News tracks grocery price trends under Trump administration to assess campaign promises on food costs

SolarSquare in talks to raise $55-60M Series C at up to $500M valuation as India's rooftop solar market attracts VC interest

Every Memory Stock Is Now in a Bear Market: Is Micron, SanDisk, or Applied Materials the Best Buy?

TD Synnex management to meet virtually with Barrington

Comments