EDVA Declines AI Standing Orders, Will Address AI Misuse on Case-by-Case Basis
By
Bradley Bennett
Sesame, salt, and substance. A flagship bake.
Summary
The Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) has decided not to adopt district-wide or judge-specific standing orders governing the use of generative AI in court filings, instead continuing a case-specific approach. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema confirmed this at a June 2026 event, noting that while no AI-specific standing orders are planned, lawyers who submit "ghost citations" (fabricated or hallucinated AI-generated legal citations) will face consequences. The article updates a previous March post on EDVA's approach to AI in legal proceedings.
Key quotes
· 1 pulledthe Alexandria Division does not plan to issue AI-specific standing orders, although lawyers who 'ghost cite' can expect consequences
You might also wanna read
The Ongoing Problem of AI-Generated False Citations in Court Filings
This article examines the persistent problem of lawyers submitting court filings containing AI-hallucinated case citations, despite increase
India's Supreme Court Investigates Judge's Use of Fake AI-Generated Court Orders
India's Supreme Court has threatened legal consequences after discovering that a junior judge in Andhra Pradesh used fake AI-generated court
AI Hallucinations as Legal Defense: The Accountability Gap in Corporate AI Use
The article examines the emerging legal and accountability challenge of AI hallucinations being used as a defense in corporate settings. It

AI in the Courtroom: Exploring the Potential for Artificial Intelligence as Legal Decision-Makers
The article explores the potential use of AI in the legal system, specifically examining whether artificial intelligence could serve as a ju

US Judge Withdraws Decision Due to AI-Like Errors in Legal Opinion
A US district court judge withdrew his decision in a biopharma securities case after lawyers identified fake quotes and erroneous case infor

AI in Judicial Systems: Exploring the Potential for AI Judges and Arbitrators
The article explores the potential for AI systems to serve as judges or arbitrators in legal disputes, featuring insights from Bridget McCor
