All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Exploring FORTH and Associative Languages as Better Fits for Transformer Architectures

By

rescrv

3mo ago· 3 min readenInsight

Summary

The article explores the idea that FORTH and associative/applicative programming languages might be better suited for transformer architectures than traditional recursive approaches. The author argues against the common practice of using LLMs to break down problems recursively like humans do, instead proposing that concatenative languages that focus on stack state agreement could be more effective for AI systems. The piece presents a philosophical and technical argument about programming language design for AI architectures.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
LLMs are wonderful, but I see too many people try to break down recursively to solve problems like top-down humans do.
Instead, I posit that FORTH and associative/applicative languages may be better for transformer architectures.
Concatenate, not integrate. Agree on the stack state.
I set out to question if this could be true.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Imagine you have to generate the word that succeeds this colon: ___

You might also wanna read