All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Europe's False Choice on Child Safety: Surveillance or Bans — A Third Path Exists

By

Tanya Becheva

1h ago· 11 min readenOpinion

Summary

Europe has been debating two flawed approaches to child online safety: mass surveillance of private messages ("Chat Control") or age-based platform bans. The article argues for a third path — defining what a genuinely safe platform for children looks like in testable, enforceable terms, rather than resorting to surveillance or exclusion. It critiques the lack of clear safety standards and calls for a rights-respecting framework that protects children without compromising privacy or access.

Source

bskyEurope's False Choice on Child Safety: Surveillance or Bans — A Third Path Existstechpolicy.press

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
There is a third way, one that protects children without watching them.
Yet Europe has never defined, in any testable way, what a 'safe' platform for children actually looks like.
The fight has come down to two options: scan their messages or lock them out of many platforms until they're older.
Europe has never defined, in any testable way, what a 'safe' platform for children actually looks like.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Europe has never defined, in any testable way, what a "safe" platform for children actually looks like, writes Tanya Becheva.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.