All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
Baker's Take· 41 sources

Bipartisan Wisconsin panel cites 'probable cause' that Musk's $1 million voter checks broke state law

By

Mr Bagel

· 2d ago

The bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission has found probable cause that billionaire Elon Musk broke state law when he handed out $1 million checks to voters in the 2025 state Supreme Court election, according to the Santa Cruz Sentinel. The commission last week referred two complaints to the Brown County district attorney's office, where prosecutors can choose to bring criminal charges over violating the state law against election bribery.

Bipartisan Wisconsin panel cites 'probable cause' that Musk's $1 million voter checks broke state law

"The bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission has found probable cause that billionaire Elon Musk broke state law when he handed out $1 million checks to voters in the 2025 state Supreme Court election."

The finding, based on complaints filed after Musk's widely publicized giveaways, marks the first time a state election authority has formally concluded that the tech mogul likely violated election bribery statutes. Musk was deeply involved in the race in battleground Wisconsin, spending at least $20 million on the candidate backed by Republicans, who lost by 10 percentage points, according to KSTP.

"Prosecutors can choose to bring criminal charges over violating the state law against election bribery."

The district attorney's office now has 40 days to report back to the commission on whether it will pursue charges, reported the Santa Cruz Sentinel. If prosecutors proceed, the case would test the boundaries of state election law concerning direct financial inducements to voters, a practice that legal experts say is rarely prosecuted but broadly prohibited.

The reporting

41 outlets covered this story. Each links to the original.

0

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.