EFF and Allies Argue X Corp. Should Not Evade FTC Privacy Oversight Through Name Change
By
Bill Budington
Summary
X Corp. (formerly Twitter) filed a petition with the FTC to set aside or modify a 2022 consent decree requiring regular privacy compliance reporting after the company misused user phone numbers and email addresses (provided for account security) for targeted advertising, resulting in a $150 million fine. The EFF and allies argue that X should not escape privacy oversight simply due to a corporate name change, and that the company's history of data abuse continues to warrant strong regulatory scrutiny.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledX Corp. should not be able to escape privacy compliance because it changed its name.
The order or 'consent decree' is a result of misleading the platforms' 140 million users by using private information given to secure accounts, like phone numbers and email addresses, for targeted advertising.
Strong safeguards on our information require eagle-eyed oversight when that data is abused and misused for profiteering ventures. X's actions not only showed us this in the past, but continue to do so in the present day.
You might also wanna read
Privacy advocates urge FTC to reject Musk's bid to end X privacy monitoring amid AI concerns
Privacy advocates are urging the FTC to reject Elon Musk's bid to end a consent decree that has monitored X's (formerly Twitter) privacy pra
arstechnica.com·23h agoElon Musk seeks to end FTC data-privacy audits of X, critics raise privacy concerns
Elon Musk is attempting to escape strict FTC data-privacy audits imposed on X (formerly Twitter) shortly before his takeover. The FTC order,
arstechnica.com·27d ago
Advocacy Groups Demand Apple and Google Remove X and Grok Over Nonconsensual Deepfakes
A coalition of 28 advocacy groups, including women's organizations and tech watchdogs, is demanding that Apple and Google remove X (formerly
Cox Media and marketing firms fined $930,000 for falsely claiming they spied on users via phone microphones
The FTC fined Cox Media, MindSift, and 1010 Digital Works a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they could secretly listen to users throu

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.