All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Discussion on Archive.today Privacy Concerns and Doxxing Ethics

By

rabinovich

4mo ago· 4 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article discusses concerns about an Hacker News post regarding archive.today, questioning whether it constitutes doxxing of the service's operator. The content examines the ethical boundaries between curiosity and privacy invasion, noting that while no real names appear to be revealed, the post has clearly struck a nerve with the archive.today operator who values privacy. The discussion centers on whether publishing investigative findings about someone who wants to remain anonymous respects privacy boundaries.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
Well, you clearly do have struck a nerve. And the article at least comes off as the attempt to dox someone.
Curiosity is one thing, publishing these findings (where the original sources may fade in time) is another.
It's quite evident the person behind archive.today does not want the attention.
Just saying, your post doesn't exactly say respect privacy.
All that said, the post does not actually dox anyone (as far as I can tell, every name mentioned is an alias or red herring)
Snippet from the RSS feed
Assuming you are who you say you are, thanks for the feedback.

You might also wanna read