‘Disappointed’: Cochrane journal asked researchers to publish article, then retracted it for conflicts
A developer of an AI tool for conducting literature reviews said he and his team were “excited and honored” when a Cochrane journal had extended a “specific and individual invitation” in January 2025…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read
SLIDERS: Revolutionizing Systematic Reviews with AI
SLIDERS, an innovative AI tool, streamlines systematic reviews by automating evidence assembly. Its near 90% accuracy offers a glimpse into
ArXiv to ban authors for one year over unchecked AI-generated content in papers
ArXiv will ban authors of papers that have “incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation” for one
The Verge·2mo agoAI Models Dismiss Valid Medical Research Due to Flawed 'Contrarian' System Prompts
A growing frustration among users highlights how some large language models reflexively reject well-sourced medical and sports science claim
MIT Distances Itself From Graduate Student's Viral Paper on AI Accelerating Scientific Discovery
MIT is distancing itself from a headline-making paper about AI's purported ability to accelerate the speed of science.
futurism.com·22d agoAdversarial Review of Internal AI Knowledge Base Halted Rollout, Exposed 18 Risks
On July 9, 2026, a structured adversarial review was conducted on an internal team knowledge system before it was opened to six users simult
AI and Publish-or-Perish Culture Are Overwhelming Academic Peer Review, Study Finds
As the AI Task Force for Organization Science, we provide an early account of artificial intelligence’s (AI) impact on both submissions and
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.