Europe's rearmament dilemma: deterrence by 2028 vs. long-term strategic autonomy
By
Euractiv
Summary
Europe's rearmament debate is caught between two competing priorities: military leaders who want to acquire the best weapons as quickly as possible to deter a potential Russian attack by 2028, and politicians who want defence spending to strengthen Europe's industrial base, reduce US dependence, and achieve strategic autonomy. The article argues that both sides are right, creating a dilemma where homegrown capabilities that arrive after the danger has passed are useless for deterrence.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledThe military argument is that deterrence has a deadline based on numerous estimates of Moscow being ready to attack by 2028.
You cannot deter Russia in 2028 with a weapon system that is not available until 2035.
Both sides are right; that is the dilemma.
You might also wanna read
Analysis: How Weapons Stockpile Levels Could Influence Potential US-Iran Conflict
The article examines how depleted weapons stockpiles could impact the potential conflict between the US and Iran, with US President Donald T
Europe's Strategic Push for Digital Sovereignty Amid Concerns Over US Technology Dependence
The article discusses Europe's growing concern about its dependence on US internet technology and the potential risks this poses. It highlig
theconversation.com·5mo agoRussia's Nuclear Coercion Strategy: Analyzing the "Oreshnik" Strike Scenario and Implications for NATO
The article analyzes Russia's potential use of nuclear weapons as instruments of coercion and strategic signaling rather than just for mass
Satellite imagery shows Russian military buildup along NATO borders amid UK defence funding disputes
Satellite images released by Denmark's national broadcaster, in cooperation with intelligence services, reveal Russia has been expanding doz

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.