All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

A practical framework for deciding when to use AI in L&D workflows

By

Dr Philippa Hardman

3d ago· 22 min readenInsight

Summary

The article addresses the confusion L&D teams face regarding AI adoption, caught between executive pressure to use AI everywhere and compliance teams wanting to avoid it entirely. It maps approximately 300 tasks in L&D projects against AI's capabilities and limitations, offering a framework to decide when to delegate, collaborate with, or own tasks. The piece cites statistics showing 95% of generative-AI pilots fail to scale and 74% of companies haven't seen tangible AI value, providing practical guidance for L&D professionals navigating AI integration.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
My team keeps getting told contradictory things about AI. Our CEO wants us to use it for everything. Our compliance team wants us to use it for nothing. We need a way to decide. Can you help?
Widely reported estimates suggest that around 95% of generative-AI pilots fail to reach successful scaling (Fortune, 2025).
BCG reports that 74% of companies had yet to see tangible value from their AI investments.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Aka, what I learned when I help to map the ~300 tasks involved in every L&D project to AI's strengths and limitations.

You might also wanna read