Continuous AI Assurance Still Starts With a Point in Time
By
Shea Brown
1mo agoen
Source
BABL AIContinuous AI Assurance Still Starts With a Point in Timebabl.aiContinuous monitoring is essential for AI assurance, but it does not replace independent audit. This article explains how APRA’s 2026 AI letter and ETSI TS 104 008 point toward a tiered assurance stack where continuous monitoring depends on foundational point-in-time evaluation. The post Continuous AI Assurance Still Starts With a Point in Time appeared first on BABL AI .
You might also wanna read

Why Traditional Monitoring Fails AI Systems: The Case for Continuous Behavioral Feedback
This article argues that traditional threshold-based monitoring tools are inadequate for detecting AI system failures because AI degrades si
UX Magazine·1mo ago
AI Assurance Must Precede Trust in Intelligence Community Systems
The article discusses the risks and challenges of adopting AI in intelligence and operational environments, particularly within the IC (Inte
Enterprise AI Reaches Inflection Point as Industry Shifts from Copilots to Autonomous Agentic Systems
Enterprise AI is reaching an inflection point, shifting from experimental copilots and assistants toward autonomous agentic systems. A confl
forbes.com·24d agoContinuous Quality & Validation: Testing at the Speed AI Now Demands: SD Times 100
sdtimes.com·5d ago
Veteran CEO critiques AI hype as disconnected from business reality after 25 years of tech cycles
A veteran CEO with 25 years of experience critiques the current AI hype cycle, arguing that boardroom and investor conversations about AI ha
Preparing for Agentic AI: Identity Control and Just-in-Time Authorization as Key Requirements
The article discusses the transition toward agentic AI systems that can act autonomously on behalf of users. It emphasizes the critical need

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.