All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Comparative Analysis of Small Functional Programming Language Implementations

By

surprisetalk

3mo ago· 15 min readenInsight

Summary

The article presents a comparative analysis of various small functional programming language implementations, focusing on their features, implementation languages, and characteristics. It examines multiple projects including Hirrolot's CoC, Harrop MiniML, Algorithm W, and others, detailing their source code size, implementation language, support for features like HM type inference, algebraic data types, pattern matching, and compilation targets. The content appears to be a technical reference or comparison chart for programming language enthusiasts and implementers.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
LOC Host HM ADTs Match Cl. Target
Hirrolot's CoC src ~70 OCaml ✗ ✗ ✗ ✓ Interpreter
Harrop MiniML src ~100 OCaml ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ LLVM → native
Algorithm W src ~300 Haskell ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ Type checker only
lambda-calculus-hs src ~200–900 Haskell ✗ ✓ ✓ ✓ Interpreter
Snippet from the RSS feed
a pungent monad odor that attracts mathochists

You might also wanna read