All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why automakers choose cheap touchscreens over safer physical controls

By

Ben Stolovitz

2h ago· 26 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues that the auto industry's widespread adoption of touchscreens in vehicles is driven primarily by cost savings, not by user experience or safety considerations. Touchscreens are cheaper to manufacture and install than traditional physical controls like knobs and dials. The author contends that while manufacturers market touchscreens as modern and cool, the real motivation is reducing production costs, and this comes at the expense of driver safety and usability.

Source

Hacker NewsWhy automakers choose cheap touchscreens over safer physical controlsben.stolovitz.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Touchscreens are simple, flexible, and seem ill-suited to controlling 4,000lb machines.
I argue the auto industry loves touchscreens because they're cheap. Anything else, like coolness or ease-of-use, is secondary.
They replace knobs & dials with colossal touchscreens and bedeck every remaining surface in plastic capacitive buttons.
Snippet from the RSS feed
I argue the auto industry loves touchscreens because they're cheap. Anything else, like coolness or ease-of-use, is secondary. They are chosen in a culture of cost.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.