Why automakers choose cheap touchscreens over safer physical controls
By
Ben Stolovitz
Summary
The article argues that the auto industry's widespread adoption of touchscreens in vehicles is driven primarily by cost savings, not by user experience or safety considerations. Touchscreens are cheaper to manufacture and install than traditional physical controls like knobs and dials. The author contends that while manufacturers market touchscreens as modern and cool, the real motivation is reducing production costs, and this comes at the expense of driver safety and usability.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledTouchscreens are simple, flexible, and seem ill-suited to controlling 4,000lb machines.
I argue the auto industry loves touchscreens because they're cheap. Anything else, like coolness or ease-of-use, is secondary.
They replace knobs & dials with colossal touchscreens and bedeck every remaining surface in plastic capacitive buttons.
You might also wanna read
The Intentional Design Behind Graphical User Interfaces
This article discusses the design principles behind Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) that make digital interactions intuitive and seamless.
8 Affordable Car Gadgets for a Safer, More Comfortable Drive
This article reviews 8 car gadgets that enhance safety, comfort, and convenience while driving. It covers products like the Amazon Echo Auto
5 ways Android Auto outperforms built-in car infotainment systems
This article compares Android Auto to built-in car infotainment systems, arguing that Android Auto is superior despite automakers equipping
zdnet.com·29d agoDistinguishing Real Technology from Consumer Gadgetry: A Personal Reflection
A reflective and opinionated essay arguing that what society commonly calls "technology" (like car infotainment screens, smart devices) is o
Why eSIM is actually better than physical SIM cards: A skeptic's conversion
The author recounts their initial skepticism about eSIM technology, viewing it as a downgrade from physical SIM cards due to concerns about

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.